City of Moscow Mills — Local services in Moscow Mills

As a Moscow Mills taxpayer, I filed Sunshine Law requests in 2025 to resolve property line disputes behind my home at Moscow Meadows Trailer Park, tied to illegal dumping, trespassing, ect. Missouri law (§ 610.023.3, RSMo) demands prompt, complete records. Instead, the clerk sent unsigned, incomplete documents—lacking Board of Aldermen approval—and when I went to the mayor she dodged my follow-ups, claiming “undue stress” in a recorded meeting. That’s your job—answer taxpayers, not hide!

The clerk admitted in writing that city crews used our tax dollars—cleaned this private property, with the mayor confirming she called the landlord for “permission.” This misuse of funds violates § 576.040, RSMo. I wrote to the Board of Aldermen, who did nothing to address this or the unsigned documents, including Davenport’s questionable city attorney contract (§ 432.070, RSMo). When I pressed—my First Amendment right—Davenport sent an illegal cease-and-desist, accusing me of “harassment” for lawful questions. This chills free speech (Lautermilch v. Hook, 8th Cir. 2002).

I filed another Sunshine Law request to investigate Davenport’s role—since my taxes pay her salary—but she responded to her own request, claiming attorney-client privilege to dodge accountability. This misuse of public funds and obstruction of transparency (§ 610.023.3, § 576.040, RSMo)

My evidence—recordings, emails, timestamps—is ironclad. Another C&D? I’ll countersue under anti-SLAPP laws (§ 537.528, RSMo). Moscow Mills: The mayor, Davenport, and the do-nothing Board must stop abusing power and wasting our money.

This isn't even the beginning of the evidence I have. Wait until I start releasing recorded videos and calls regarding all this. Along with receipts for the certified letter to the board of Aldermen so I know you got it. lol

Moscow Mills PD’s just as bad—total trash. Weeks after ticketing me for no lights, I yelled at an officer to turn his on at the corner at 3 in the morning. He blew me off while their patrol cruised Kathy Ave blacked out for a 1/4 mile, like a “screw you” taunt (video proof). Please keep in mind that these videos are just Snippets and they're much longer. After my Sunshine Law request to ID the driver, they spotlighted my house for several nights to intimidate me. (video proof) Another officer harassed me over legal parking, and yesterday, a lieutenant botched my trespass call, asking if the intruder wanted to press charges against me. They break laws while targeting residents. I will give credit where it's due to Deputy James, Miller and their sergeant which seems like they take their...

This review complies with Google’s policies, based on my documented experience with audio recordings, emails, videos, and Sunshine Law records (Missouri Chapter 610, RSMo), shared with the Missouri AG’s Office. No full names are used except where allowed.

As a Moscow Mills taxpayer, I filed Sunshine Law requests in 2025 to resolve property line disputes behind my home at Moscow Meadows Trailer Park, tied to illegal dumping, trespassing, ect. Missouri law (§ 610.023.3, RSMo) demands prompt, complete records. Instead, the clerk sent unsigned, incomplete documents—lacking Board of Aldermen approval—and when I went to the mayor she dodged my follow-ups, claiming “undue stress” in a recorded meeting. That’s your job—answer taxpayers, not hide!

The clerk admitted in writing that city crews used our tax dollars—cleaned this private property, with the mayor confirming she called the landlord for “permission.” This misuse of funds violates § 576.040, RSMo. I wrote to the Board of Aldermen, who did nothing to address this or the unsigned documents, including Davenport’s questionable city attorney contract (§ 432.070, RSMo). When I pressed—my First Amendment right—Davenport sent an illegal cease-and-desist, accusing me of “harassment” for lawful questions. This chills free speech (Lautermilch v. Hook, 8th Cir. 2002).

I filed another Sunshine Law request to investigate Davenport’s role—since my taxes pay her salary—but she responded to her own request, claiming attorney-client privilege to dodge accountability. This misuse of public funds and obstruction of transparency (§ 610.023.3, § 576.040, RSMo)

My evidence—recordings, emails, timestamps—is ironclad. Another C&D? I’ll countersue under anti-SLAPP laws (§ 537.528, RSMo). Moscow Mills: The mayor, Davenport, and the do-nothing Board must stop abusing power and wasting our money.

This isn't even the beginning of the evidence I have. Wait until I start releasing recorded videos and calls regarding all this. Along with receipts for the certified letter to the board of Aldermen so I know...

This review complies with Google’s policies, based on my documented experience with audio recordings, emails, videos, and Sunshine Law records (Missouri Chapter 610, RSMo), shared with the Missouri AG’s Office. No full names are used except where allowed.

As a Moscow Mills taxpayer, I filed Sunshine Law requests in 2025 to resolve property line disputes behind my home at Moscow Meadows Trailer Park, tied to illegal dumping, trespassing, ect. Missouri law (§ 610.023.3, RSMo) demands prompt, complete records. Instead, the clerk sent unsigned, incomplete documents—lacking Board of Aldermen approval—and when I went to the mayor she dodged my follow-ups, claiming “undue stress” in a recorded meeting. That’s your job—answer taxpayers, not hide!

The clerk admitted in writing that city crews used our tax dollars—cleaned this private property, with the mayor confirming she called the landlord for “permission.” This misuse of funds violates § 576.040, RSMo. I wrote to the Board of Aldermen, who did nothing to address this or the unsigned documents, including Davenport’s questionable city attorney contract (§ 432.070, RSMo). When I pressed—my First Amendment right—Davenport sent an illegal cease-and-desist, accusing me of “harassment” for lawful questions. This chills free speech (Lautermilch v. Hook, 8th Cir. 2002).

I filed another Sunshine Law request to investigate Davenport’s role—since my taxes pay her salary—but she responded to her own request, claiming attorney-client privilege to dodge accountability. This misuse of public funds and obstruction of transparency (§ 610.023.3, § 576.040, RSMo)

My evidence—recordings, emails, timestamps—is ironclad. Another C&D? I’ll countersue under anti-SLAPP laws (§ 537.528, RSMo). Moscow Mills: The mayor, Davenport, and the do-nothing Board must stop abusing power and wasting our money.

This isn't even the beginning of the evidence I have. Wait until I start releasing recorded videos and calls regarding all this. Along with receipts for the certified letter to the board of Aldermen so I know...