Let's start with the fact that Michelin stars primarily reflect the assessment of cuisine: it encompasses the quality of ingredients, the intricacies of preparation, the harmonious blend of flavors, the chef's originality, and the presentation of dishes. However, they can also take into account factors such as the level of service, wine selection, service quality, atmosphere, and interior.

So, what did the restaurant earn its star for? Perhaps for the ambiance of an old pub? Or for utterly ordinary service? Maybe for extraordinary dishes?

For me, it was the most disappointing restaurant visit. The dishes were so mediocre and uninspiring that I regretted spending our money. The scallops were cooked in reused oil, which was very evident. The second dish was just steamed fish, so bland that I wanted to ask for Heinz ketchup to add some flavor. It was served on a spinach cushion that was overcooked and soggy. Look at the appearance of these dishes, is this really Michelin quality?

My dessert tasted like a regular store-bought cookie. What was delicious was the ice cream.

Oh, I almost forgot. The complimentary bread had such a tough crust on the dark bread (probably with flax seeds or something) that, despite my strong teeth, I was concerned about them. It's absurd. I wouldn't recommend it.

Can high-quality food really lead to indigestion the next morning? My husband and I didn't feel well.

Ireland is a beautiful country, but if you want to enjoy a delicious meal, I suggest going home and cooking or booking a plane ticket elsewhere.