Following referral, and actually being able to speak with a lawyer regarding my situation, that has lasted about 12 years, today I learned something new:
Any person, however clear-thinking, and however innocent, can be taken off the street via an untrustworthy/negligent (though doubtfully well-meaning) Victoria Police - even due to a False Accusation, and sent to a Hospital - specifically to it's Psychiatric Ward. There, such a person can be drugged without much discussion or say in the matter, and so heavily drugged, at that, that most of their thought clarity can be taken away from them. There, many inaccurate things can be written about them, with some additional falsehood, added here and there, there they can be manipulated by a team of people entrusted to "heal" until even they themselves would consider themselves to be unwell (irregardless of whether or not they actually were to begin with). If one such chooses against to take such substance, they are forced into them via syringe. Such people are often classed as "schizophrenic", a word with stigma already, implying some sort of permanent disability or thinking impairment, irregardless of whether or not there had been one before Police arrived. And they are let back out to the "free" world on a Disability Pension that would never suffice them to raise a Healthy Family.
For this reason, and even others, that are not anyone's business but my own, I have not yet been able to confidently approach a Female regarding Relationship. Because attempting to lead a responsible Life, I would best not pursue to even hope to Marry, if I can not first to support a Family and provide for the Children I had hoped to bear with my Wife, since I was about ten years of age.
For in my situation, an arrogant man from CATT came to my home also, uninvited, forbade me from employment, made a false promise, talked a lot of other garbage, and exited. And though I perceived hypocrisy, I obeyed.
About 12 years of my life were stolen from me because of this situation, and to this day I found no Justice in the matter.
And it was not so much the fault of lawyers (who are trying to feed their own Families, and require [a statistically more guaranteed] money), the system here simply was set up in a way, that no matter the quality and quantity of work done after one realises what has happened and stops taking those destructive substances, it became impossible to prove that one had even sustained any loss, even being altogether well before Police intervention following a False Accusation in 2012 AD, and after being permitted (but recommended against) ceasing such "medications" in 2024 AD.
One could almost even sue one's schools of education, for not warning them about Australia (But I can barely afford even my meal). My hospital records were published on my Composer page on IMSLP, but it solved nothing - there was no compensation or retraction or apology, or regained time or improved health, they basically tortured me for a long time, got paid for it, and pretended it acceptable. It did not even matter to be called a genius by another musical genius, they seemed to hope my bloodline to end with me, and to accumulate some wealth in the process.
There was no wealth for any of my toil, no payment for working overtime, because I had been obedient to the instruction of the arrogant man from CATT, who was not welcome in my home to begin with, who I had treated with respect.
I had prayed and hoped to become Married, and to be part of a Happy Family. I was not even portraying against government, but they did manage to steal many years of my time and wellbeing, and were employed to do so.
The systems were set up in such a way, that there was NO JUSTICE found in such situation. Stolen Time is very precious, that also is a theft - but all of those lawyers told me to go away.
Thou Shalt Not Steal.
El, the Creator of the Heart and Soul, will Judge every single one of those evil people - before they breathe their last, or afterwards - and His Judgement is a...
Read moreAs a profoundly Deaf litigant, I was denied access to justice by the Supreme Court of Victoria in proceedings that should have upheld the values of fairness, integrity, and inclusion.
Despite ultimately admitting to disability discrimination — including the failure to provide an Auslan interpreter during critical interlocutory and final hearings — the Court took no remedial steps during the proceeding itself. This failure breached both the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic) and the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic). The matter proceeded to final judgment without any effort to restore procedural fairness or enable my effective participation as a person with disability.
The injustice was further compounded when the opposing party relied on a false affidavit — a matter I raised formally, clearly, and with corroborating evidence. Judicial officers were placed on notice of the misconduct but refused to act. No inquiry was undertaken, and the false affidavit remained on the record uncorrected. This was not a matter of oversight, but of conscious disregard. The Court knowingly permitted tainted evidence to stand, thereby undermining the integrity of the judicial process.
Multiple written communications to the Court registry, alerting them to the admitted discrimination and evidentiary misconduct, were either ignored or failed to be transmitted to the presiding judge. Concerns going to the heart of procedural fairness were systematically sidelined.
On appeal, the Court’s use of artificial intelligence tools in preparing reasons for judgment became apparent. The resulting decision conspicuously omitted any reference to the pleaded grounds of disability discrimination or the acknowledged false affidavit. These were not minor omissions — they were deliberate. Their exclusion appears calculated to shield the Court from scrutiny and reputational embarrassment, rather than to engage faithfully with the legal and factual issues before it.
Most seriously, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Victoria — once placed on notice — failed to take any action to remedy the known miscarriage of justice or address the institutional breaches of anti-discrimination law. This inaction constitutes a breach of section 28AAA of the Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic), which requires the Chief Justice to ensure that the Court, as a public authority, acts compatibly with human rights and gives proper consideration to relevant rights in decision-making.
This experience has irreparably eroded my confidence in the Victorian judiciary’s ability — or willingness — to protect the rights of persons with disability, uphold the rule of law, or honour its stated values. Acknowledgment of wrongdoing means little if judicial officers refuse to correct it.
This is not an isolated grievance. It reflects a deeper, systemic culture: one where the appearance of justice is preserved, even as its substance is denied.
I am happy to provide documentary...
Read morethis court is not a very good place for a multitude of reasons. first of all they do not have computers at all in our current year of 2006 or even in the future in 2024. this is very bad because it shows that they haven't gotten with the times and are very slow with many things, including the court sessions too. why do court sessions take so long? just say whatever you need to say and be done with it. 10 minute job honestly, but they stretch it out to multiple hours to maximise profit. the supreme court is actually a privately owned company, it should be a public company so i can invest in the supreme court of victoria industry. so anyway i went here because i was convicted of assault on france, but they let me off the hook because they can recognise that france deserved it due to how bad it is. after the session i went to the library here. it was pretty mid. 3/5
also this place was in a river once or something idk,...
Read more