Worcester District Court and Superior Court — Local services in Worcester

REMAINING PORTION OF CASE

3. “Stayed outside place of work for hours despite being turned away by security and blocked coworkers path to her car” Plaintiff claim here is FALSE and MISLEADING. Defendant stayed around because Defendant sole purpose was to make contact with our child and understand reason for change in her behavior. Defendant was NEVER asked by any security person to leave the premises till 4.30pm when Plaintiff called on the UMASS police on us. Plaintiff claim Defendant blocked coworker path to her car is ABSOLUTELY FALSE and made with MISLEADING MALIN intentions. Defendant was more than FOURTY foot (see Appendix A, page 1 for approx. locations) away from Plaintiff or coworker sitting on side concrete. The eyewitness to this is my younger daughter. Recording is being subpoena from UMASS security.
4. “ Continuously sent harassing texts throughout the night” The statement made here is FALSE and MISLEADING. Plaintiff is trying to mislead the court by using words that are suitable to meet criteria under G.L. c. 209A classification. Per general law Part IV, Title I, Chapter 265, Section 43A, the text messages sent does not meet the criteria of harrasment. In Appendix A, page 2-5. Defendant is submitting all the texts send to her on the night of 7/6/2021, that is in question. 10-25-2020
5. “Showed up unannounced to apartment and starting knocking on all doors” Defendant did show up to place. Defendant DIDN’T knock on any door. Defendant was standing approx. 60ft away (see Appendix A page 6 for approx. locations) from apartment as defendant knew the roommate had too much knowledge of law in wrong way (based on discussion with roommate the previous night) So, Defendant did not go near the door. The statement here is again FALSE and MISLEADING. Plaintiff never came out of house to see us. It was Plaintiff friend who came out. And Defendant asked Plaintiff friend not to come in between family matter. Plaintiff friend also called Police while Defendant was on call with Police. Defendant called the POLICE to see if Police can help Defendant and Spouse have 5 minutes conversation with Plaintiff.
6. “Called Police and lied that I had stolen his laptop and Phone” Defendant did call POLICE as stated above. But Defendant did not state the laptop was stolen. Defendant just wanted to get laptop back as it is asset the defendant bought for Plaintiff and wanted to get it back. Defendant never asked for phone to be given back. The statement given by Plaintiff is MALIGN and intentionally MISLEADING to court. 10/24/2020
7. “Showed up announced to apartment” Defendant came along with wife to discuss the Plaintiff behavioral change. Our expectation from Plaintiff was one phone call a day, if possible. We stay 1700+ miles away from Plaintiff. The only way to connect to Plaintiff is phone. Plaintiff does not call for Days, even weeks leading to concern in Spouse mind if everything is fine with Plaintiff? We wanted to understand why she would not call, we wanted to understand what is her plan in life, we wanted to understand where we went wrong in life that Plaintiff does not want to talk to us.
8. Threatened me with Physical violence The statement made by Plaintiff is FALSE and MISLEADING. If Defendant threatened physically, why didn’t the Plaintiff call Police? If she forgot, the next day when Police came, why didn’t not she complain of Physical violence. In Appendix A page 7, Defendant submitting report from Police of that day incidence.
9. “Physically intimidated my roommate and me.” The statement made by Plaintiff is FALSE and MISLEADING. If Defendant physically intimidated, why didn’t the Plaintiff friend or Plaintiff call Police. If both of them forgot, the next day when Police came, why didn’t not anyone of them complain of Physical intimidation to Police. From the above details, it is clear that Plaintiff is not in good state of mind to make sound decisions. Plaintiff has made all FALSE and MISLEADING claims to cause pain to Defendant, a law abiding...

The Worcester District Court is a remarkable institution that upholds the highest standards of justice, dignity, and community service. From the moment one enters, it is evident that every individual working here—from the security team to court clerks, attorneys, and judges—serves with profound dedication and respect for the principles of fairness and integrity. The people here demonstrate an unwavering commitment to their roles, reflecting a genuine love for the city and its citizens. The atmosphere in this courthouse fosters a sense of purpose and moral clarity, assuring visitors of a fair and impartial process with each interaction.

The courthouse itself is thoughtfully designed to provide a sense of openness and calm. Its expansive halls, high ceilings, and abundant natural light create an atmosphere that eases any anxieties associated with legal proceedings. The architecture, featuring cool marble surfaces, evokes an introspective quality that invites visitors to consider their own values and responsibilities. There is a sense of gravitas here, of being in a space where justice is treated with the utmost seriousness and where all who enter are encouraged to reflect on their actions and choices.

Throughout the building, the Worcester District Court provides comprehensive resources to support the needs of all individuals. Flyers placed around the facility offer information on a range of community and government services, from family resource fairs under the theme “Diverse Threads. One Tapestry: The Strength of Connections” to notifications for court cases and guidelines on court conduct. Bulletin boards on each floor present additional, area-specific resources, ensuring everyone can easily access support in areas such as juvenile, family, and criminal court proceedings. These resources reflect a clear commitment to public service and a desire to make the courthouse accessible to all members of the community.

This commitment to inclusivity and remembrance is also evident in the courthouse’s decor and displays. The entrance proudly displays flags from numerous countries, underscoring Worcester’s diverse community and affirming the American motto, “E pluribus unum”—“Out of many, one.” The courthouse also features displays and literature on the civil rights movement and the evolution of the American judicial system, including a binder dedicated to distinguished African American lawyers from Massachusetts. These exhibits not only honor history but also inspire visitors, highlighting the progress made toward equality and justice.

Families and young children are thoughtfully considered as well. The courthouse provides a dedicated lactation pod and incorporates kid-friendly images to help alleviate the often intimidating environment, ensuring a welcoming experience for all who visit. Thoughtful patriotic touches, like golden eagles and flag displays, further enhance the courthouse's dignified atmosphere and serve as a reminder of the role each citizen plays in upholding justice and community values.

Though I was unaware that photography was restricted until my visit concluded, I took a few photos of the courthouse interior, which I plan to share. These images carefully respect individuals' privacy while also showcasing the building’s striking architectural beauty and the inspiring atmosphere it embodies. I will happily remove them at any time.

The Worcester District Court is more than a place of legal proceedings; it stands as a beacon of reflection, reform, and public service. As I walked through its halls, I was particularly moved by a quote prominently displayed: “No great reform was ever projected or early espoused by any powerful organization... It began in the heart of a solitary individual,” by William Lloyd Garrison. May this quote serve as a powerful reminder that the capacity for change to do good is within us all—it simply depends on whether we choose to nurture the good or the...

Judge should think twice before issuing restraining order. In MA, it permanently goes in record. I have no criminal record or any civil record. I am 51 year of age. You decide if Judge made right decision.. Case details below

Docket No 2162RO1001

REPLY TO RESTRAINING ORDER COMES now, Defendant, Rajesh Singh (Pro Se) and request the Honorable Judge to deny the restraining order due to reason listed below Defendant has helped Plaintiff in every step of her life. Plaintiff and Defendant have lived together for beautiful memorable Twenty years (approx.). Life had very beautiful memorable moments together. Defendant had helped Plaintiff financially, morally, emotionally, and any way possible to become successful and productive citizen of society. Unlike to what is described in the case. BACKGROUND When Plaintiff got job at UMASS, Defendant helped Plaintiff to buy New car, New Phone, drove from Dallas, TX to Shrewsbury, MA along with Plaintiff to find suitable apartment. Stayed with Plaintiff for a week to buy all household Utensils, Groceries and bedding to name a few. Made every arrangement to make Plaintiff feel comfortable. Assembled the bedding. Since, Plaintiff didn’t have Credit history, Defendant put his name in financing Lexus, gave down payment for the vehicle purchase. Defendant put his name as co-occupant in apartment as Plaintiff didn’t have credit to get apartment. Defendant paid rents till Plaintiff got another co-applicant and made initial security deposit for the apartment. Defendant made sure electricity, gas and internet was set up and paid for, before he left for Dallas, TX. Defendant did everything possible to provide all comfort to Plaintiff daughter before leaving to another world that is 1700 plus miles away. Defendant till today is trying to understand what went wrong to make Plaintiff hate Defendant father this much. Defendant has always helped the Plaintiff daughter. Before moving to UMASS, Plaintiff was studying at Brown University in Providence, RI. Defendant went through the same chores of making sure Plaintiff was settled properly. Defendant took care of all her fee at Brown University, Apartment Rental, Apartment Deposit, electricity. The list continues. Plaintiff is my Child and Defendant has moral obligation to take care of child. Similarly, Defendant has helped Plaintiff in her life from High School to Post Graduation. Every steps of her life, in a positive way. Plaintiff had lovely relationship with Defendant till October 2, Appendix A page 9. Only expectation Defendant that time and now is one call a day to Mother. And just for that expectation she is taking these steps, is beyond imaginable. REPLY TO PLAINTIFF CLAIM ON AFFIDAVIT 7/6/2021

1. “Filed false missing persons report claiming that no contact had been made since November 2020”. Defendant called for missing person report because Plaintiff last known place of residence was 5204 Arbor Drive, Shrewsbury, MA. Plaintiff contract there was till July 2021. Plaintiff changed her location to unknown place without informing Parents. Defendant, as concern parents, wanted to make sure daughter is safe. After not getting reply to text messages or phone call, Defendant under duress had to call the police.
2. “Showed up at place of work unannounced”. Defendant was in Washington DC along with Spouse and younger daughter. Drove to Shrewsbury MA to see the Plaintiff. We knew daughter state of mind. But wanted to make every possible positive attempt to talk to her and understand why this behavior. We have not done anything to see this day in life. As mentioned above, we have provided every positive thing in life to all our kids, Plaintiff included.

REMAINING POST IN...